_{3}(Sr, Ti, O and H depicted as green, gray, red and white spheres, respectively; the potential energy surface has been calculated using the Quantum Espresso package), see the preprint for other examples.

I have compared their presented modification of the string method to the nudged elastic band method (NEB). Both methods sample the path using a finite number of images. An initial guess for the path is optimized by gradient following. The two methods differ in how the sliding down of intermediate images from barriers is prevented. For the NEB, this is achieved by introducing virtual spring forces, keeping the images apart. For the string method, the path is iteratively re-parametrized such that the path is evenly sampled.

Both methods perform similarly well. Below are shown the potential energies for MEPs obtained using the string and NEB methods for the above proton diffusion path in SrTiO

_{3}, respectively:

The residual gradients in the initial and final configurations seem to be a little too large, therefore the NEB path shows the tendency to have minima away from these configurations. The string method, which is implemented here to fulfill Eq. 6 of the preprint at each optimization step, is more stable against this problem (in the case of the NEB, intermediate configurations at ~0.5 and ~4 Å should be relaxed separately as new boundary configurations).

What is interesting is that the new string method shows a slightly better convergence of the MEP (here optimized using Broyden's method with rank one Quasi-Newton updates):

Instead of plain re-parametrization at each step, the more sophisticated schemes outlined in the preprint might even yield better convergence. Despite the simplicity of what was implemented here, this seems to be basically as good as the NEB method.

What if you had a more complicated path, say a non-symmetric one?

ReplyDeleteFor asymmetric paths (where an odd number of images does not ensure that the transition state is sampled), a climbing image approach could be employed, which should work equally well for the NEB and string methods. For the latter this would mean, that one image with reverted tangential gradient is excluded from the re-parametrization.

ReplyDeleteThe string method and its variants work well for non-symmetrics paths too.

ReplyDelete